Sunday, 6 December 2015

Specific performance of agreement _ Reasonable period _ Some recent case laws

Suit for specific performance _ Period of one year was agreed for executing the sale deed _ Though it was necessary for the defendant to obtain permission from the competent authority but the intention of parties to make time the essence of the agreement is evident _ Agreement further stipulates that if permission is not obtained within period of one year, then the sale deed would be executed within a period of one month from obtaining such permission _ Subsequent stipulation in the agreement does not prescribe the outer limit for obtaining such permission _ Permission was required to be obtained within reasonable time which can be taken to be three years _ Even assumed that after reasonable period of three years from 21-4-1989 which is 21-4-1992 there was refusal on the part of the defendant, in terms of Article 54 of Limitation Act the suit could have been filed within three years, that is till 20-4-1995 _ Suit was filed on 13-6-2001 after almost six years _ Suit as filed was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act. (See 2015 (6) LJSOFT 170)

Suit for specific performance _ There is no presumption as to time being the essence of the contract _ Though no time is fixed for performance of contract but it does not mean that the agreement stipulated indefinite period for performance of contract _ Contract to be performed within reasonable time but the question "what is a reasonable time", is, in each particular case, a question of fact. (See 2015 (3) LJSOFT 136)

Suit for specific performance of contract _ Though time is not the essence of contract in respect of sale of immovable property but in so far as urban properties are concerned, the contract should be concluded within a reasonable time. (See 2011 (11) LJSOFT 135)

Suit for specific performance of contract _ Appellant did not move the court in reasonable time _ Vendor had already died _ When the suit was filed there were minor children _ Property was ancestral property and the appellant/ plaintiff ought to have shown that there was legal necessity for sale of the property _ Since no question of limitation was raised by the Court below it is not possible to enter into that question in Second Appeal _ However it would not be equitable to allow the specific performance _ Specific performance need not be granted merely it is lawful to do so _ Appeal allowed to the extent of refund of money and as a consequential relief the respondents would be entitled to get back possession of the house property. (See 2009 (12) LJSOFT 207)

Suit for specific performance of Agreement of Sale _ No time specified for performance of promise but the contract must be performed within a reasonable time _ What is the reasonable time is to be seen in Article 54 of Limitation Act _ For specific performance of contract three years time is prescribed under the said Article and, therefore, reasonable time means three years _ Trial Court rightly held that the suit was time barred as the same was not filed within reasonable time. (See 2008 (10) LJSOFT 76)

Suit for specific performance of agreement of sale _ No date for performance fixed in the agreement _ Suit could be held to be barred by limitation only on a finding that plaintiffs had notice of refusal of performance by the defendants and that the plaintiffs approached the court beyond three years of the date of notice _ Question of limitation could be dealt with only after evidence is taken and not as a preliminary issue. (See 2006 (4) LJSOFT (SC) 24)

Magistrate has no power to take cognizance of the offence under Prevention of Corruption act.

Magistrate has no power to take cognizance of the offence under Prevention of Corruption act. Magistrate can't pass an order u/s. 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. in respect of offence which Special Judge alone is competent to try.

2015 All MR ( cri ) 1080.

Shri Nilesh S. Rane
V/s
Mr. Ravikanth Yadav and Others.

NI Act Ordinance 2015 is Retrospective

Dashrath Rathod’s Judgment have no effect in view of the Amendment;

A Two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justices J.S.Khehar and R.Banumati has held that, in view of the Amended Section 142(2) of Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance 2015, the place where a cheque is delivered for collection i.e., the branch of the bank of the payee or holder in due course, where the drawee maintains an account, would be the determinative of the place of territorial jurisdiction for filing Complaint under the NI Act. The Bench was hearing an Appeal from an order dated 5.5. 2011 of Madhya Pradesh High Court in which it is held that the Jurisdiction to file a Complaint under NI Act lay only before the Court where-in the original drawee bank was located. The High Court relied on the Three Judge Bench Judgment of the Supreme Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra. Allowing the Appeal Justice Khehar held as follows; “Insofar as the instant aspect of the matter is concerned, a reference may be made to Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015, whereby Section 142A was inserted into the Negotiable Instruments Act. A perusal of Sub-section (1) thereof leaves no room for any doubt, that insofar as the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is concerned, on the issue of jurisdiction, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, would have to give way to the provisions of the instant enactment on account of the non-obstante clause in sub-section (1) of Section 142A. Likewise, any judgment, decree, order or direction issued by a Court would have no effect insofar as the territorial jurisdiction for initiating proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is concerned. In the above view of the matter, we are satisfied, that the judgment rendered by this Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod’s case would also not non-suit the appellant for the relief claimed.” “A perusal of the amended Section 142(2 leaves no room for any doubt, especially in view of the explanation thereunder, that with reference to an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the place where a cheque is delivered for collection i.e. the branch of the bank of the payee or holder in due course, where the drawee maintains an account, would be determinative of the place of territorial jurisdiction”. The Bench said. It is also held that “Section 142(2)(a), amended through the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015, vests jurisdiction for initiating proceedings for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, inter alia in the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, where the cheque is delivered for collection (through an account of the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains an account). We are also satisfied, based on Section 142A(1) to the effect, that the judgment rendered by this Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod’s case, would not stand in the way of the appellant, insofar as the territorial jurisdiction for initiating proceedings emerging from the dishonor of the cheque in the present case arises.” “The words “…as if that sub-section had been in force at all material times…” used with reference to Section 142(2), in Section 142A(1) gives retrospectivity to the provision”.
Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd Vs  Inderpal Singh.

SOME IMPORTANT DECISIONS REPORTED IN DECEMBER, 2015

Acquisition of land _ Declaration u/s 6 would be non est if it is not published within a period of one year from the date of the last publication of Section 4 notification. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 9)

Addition of accused _ Allegations against Investigating Officer that he helped the accused persons unlawfully _ It would be another offence, if any, for which separate trial would be necessary _ Provisions of Section 319 of Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked.. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (AUR) 16)

Appreciation of evidence _ Refreshing the memory has to be done before the Court and not stealthily _ Impermissible for a witness to stealthily refresh his memory before entering the Court and deposing about the entire evidence. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (AUR) 148)

Arbitrator _  Appointment of _ Parties are Indian and had agreed to the seat of the arbitration at Singapore _  Since both the parties are from India the parties cannot be allowed to derogate from Indian law _ This is part of the public policy of the country _ Said agreement which provides for arbitration in India thus does not violate section 28(1)(a) _ Proceedings filed u/s 11(6) maintainable. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 104)

Arbitration proceedings _  Commodity Exchange Trading _ Margin money _ Shortfall in margin money _  Petitioner could not have squared off the open position of the respondent without demanding any additional amount. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 134)

Caste certificate _ Invalidation of _ Petitioner has completed M.B.B.S. course as a reserved category student on the basis of interim order which continued in operation for last about 16 years _ Public money spent on his education cannot be allowed to be lost by invalidating the educational qualifications. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 24)

Chapter proceedings _ Dispute regarding possession of plot _ Section 145 of Cr. P.C. is not meant for declaration of possession or ownership of the parties over the property. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 166)

Criminal trial _ I.O. withholding a statement of victim recorded by the Executive Magistrate _ I.O. expected to remain impartial and place all the material is collected during the course of investigation _ He cannot be choosy of filing only those documents or placing only that material which, according to him, is against the accused person _ Fit case where the adverse inference could be drawn against the prosecution. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 10)

Disciplinary enquiry _ Non-teaching staff in college _ Rule 46 of the Rules of 1984 provides for the procedure for imposing major penalty _ Preparation and giving of articles of charge by the Enquiry Officer is a serious lapse and impermissible under the service jurisprudence _ If such an exercise is permitted, it will amount to permitting a person to be a judge in his own cause. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 111)

Dishonour of cheque _ Service of notice _ No evidence to prove that the complainant had dispatched the notice at the proper address either by R.P.A.D. or by certificate of posting _ Deeming provision u/s 27 of General Clauses Act cannot be invoked. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 37)

Divorce _ Appellant proved that after the solemnization of his marriage the respondent no.1 was guilty of voluntary sexual intercourse with some other person resulting in birth of her son _ In the light of the DNA report, presumption u/s 112 of Evidence Act would stand rebutted _  Appellant made out a case for grant of divorce u/s Section 27(1)(a) of Special Marriage Act. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 13)

Divorce _ Permanent alimony _ Respondent-wife was unchaste as she had voluntary sexual intercourse with a person other than the appellant during the subsistence of the marriage and had also conceived a child through the said person _ Section 25(3) of H.M. Act makes it clear that an unchaste wife would not be entitled to permanent alimony. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 29)

Eviction proceedings _ Arrears of rent _ Landlord cannot take advantage of his conduct in not accepting rent sent by the tenant and then give a notice saying that the tenant is in arrears of rent for more than six months. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 62)

Eviction proceedings _ Permanent construction/ alterations _ Erection of shed on the front side of suit premises by implanting iron pole in cement and concrete to protect customers from the rains _  There is neither any element of permanency, nor any question of intention to put up any permanent structure upon the suit premises _ Said temporary structure is not within the contemplation of Section 16(1)(b) of the Rent Act. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 62)

Eviction proceedings _ No capital contributed by tenant and was not at all actively associated with the partnership business _ Tenant has parted with his possession of the suit premises in lieu of consideration of Rs.800/- p.m. _  So-called partnership was nothing but a camouflage to conceal the real transaction of unlawful subletting. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 75)

False caste certificate _ Certificates issued by the competent authority admittedly before the Act of 2000 came into force _ Constitutional guarantee under Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India shows prohibition to make the provisions for offences in any law retrospectively _ Provisions of Section 13 held to be prospective in nature and cannot be held to be retrospective in operation. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 96)

House trespass _ It is requisite for the person to have mens rea, without which, no criminal house trespass can be inferred _ Women accused had simply followed the other accused persons with no intention _ They cannot be held guilty of the offence u/s 451 of IPC. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 130)

Interim maintenance _ Educational expenses of daughter _ Court exercising powers and jurisdiction u/s 125 Cr.P.C. will be within its ambit to pass necessary orders for interim maintenance. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 33)

Interim maintenance _ Grant of maintenance pendente lite in proceedings filed u/s 7 of the Act of 1890 _ Welfare of the minor that has been granted prime importance _ Family Court in exercise of its inherent powers u/s 151 of CPC can even otherwise direct payment of interim maintenance to the minor child in proceedings u/s 7 of the Act of 1890. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 67)

Motor accident _ Compensation _ Deceased was working as an Assistant Teacher in a non-aided school and last drawn actual salary was Rs.2,800/- p.m. _ Considering the statutory provisions of the MEPS Act and the other evidence, had the deceased continued in service, he would have been regularized in his employment and would have been entitled to the benefit of the 6th pay commission _ Tribunal rightly considered the salary of Rs.40,000/- p.m. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 5)

Motor accident _ Compensation _ Income of both the husband and wife are equally important for running the house as they supplement each other’s income _ Cannot be generally said that as the other spouse (surviving) is earning, there is no dependency _ Contention that husband-claimant was not dependent on the income of his wife cannot be accepted. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 3)

Pensionary benefits _ Cause of action would accrue to the petitioner every month _ At the most the relief could be restricted to the period of three years, if the claim is found to be sustainable. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 39)

Presidents of District Consumer Redressal Forum _ No justification for denial of leave encashment benefit to an Advocate who is appointed as President of Consumer Forum. (See  2015 (12) LJSOFT 26)

Quashing of criminal proceeding _ Causing mischief to public property by followers of applicant _ Applicant was not present where the incident took place Nothing to show that his speech was provocative and was heard by other accused _ Allegations made against the applicant would not amount to abetment _ Proceedings quashed. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (AUR) 2)

Quashing of criminal proceeding _ Obscene acts in films _ Films had passed the test of Censor Board and the certification by the Censor board could not have been ignored even by Magistrate. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 4)

Quashing of F.I.R. _ Business of money lending _ Merely referring to one isolated transaction claimed to be a loan transaction or money lending would not be enough to show that the petitioner was involved in “business of money lending” without licence _ FIR quashed. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (AUR) 15)

Recording of evidence by the Assistant Sessions Judge _ Rape case _ Section 28 of Cr.P.C. makes only distinction regarding which class of Judges can pass sentence for different quantum _ It does not mandate anything recording of the evidence by particular class of Sessions Court in the matter of offences which are triable by the Sessions Court. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 100)

Recovery proceedings _ Mortgaged property cannot be redeemed on payment of a part of the mortgage money _ If the mortgaged property has to be redeemed the entire mortgage money has to be tendered. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 57)

Redemption of term deposit accounts on maturity _ Title to the moneys and to whom they should be paid ought not be a matter of concern for bankers _ Unless and until there is a specific restraint order, the bank cannot discharge its normal banking functions _ Bank cannot in the garb of a alleged title dispute refuse to abide by its contractual obligation with a customer. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 6)

Registration of document _ Delay purely attributable to the Collector of Stamps for determination of the stamp duty _ Said period is required to be excluded. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 131)

Reserved post _ Protection of services _ School Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hold either that the respondent No.1 did or did not commit fraud or that he did or did not fabricate the caste certificate showing that he belongs to Scheduled Tribe category. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 136)

Return of Sonography Machine _ It makes no good by just handing over the machine on the Supratnama in a sealed condition _ Keeping the machine in a sealed condition will not serve the purpose of anybody. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT (NAG) 40)

Sanction for prosecution _ Police officers _ Acts done under colour of duty _ Sanction of the State Government granted after two years from the date of offence was barred by limitation as prescribed u/s 161 of B.P. Act. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 167)

Succession Certificate _ Remarriage of widow _ There is no provision that disqualifies a widow of a male Hindu from inheriting from her husband if she remarries, after his death. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 92)

Tenancy rights _ Contention that tenancy in respect of the commercial premises can devolve only upon such member of the deceased tenant’s family, who was using the premises along with the original tenant at the time of such original tenant’s demise cannot be accepted _ Even otherwise the respondent is the son and therefore the legal heir of the deceased original tenant and is clearly covered under the second part of the definition of ‘tenant’ u/s 7(15)(d) of the Rent Act. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 76)

Tenancy _ Legal heirs _ Plaintiff is the widow of the original tenant and was staying along with him in the suit property at the time of his death _ Defendant is the son of step daughter of the tenant _ Even if he is considered to be the heir, he shall not become a tenant. (See 2015 (12) LJSOFT 61)

Detention in PC and jail by order by police under orders of chapter VIII crpc s 107 111,112,113,114,115,118 held illegal

High court Bombay ( aurangsbad bench)  decision 9th June 2015
Fayaz attar vs state of Maharashtra

Detention in PC and jail by order by police under orders of chapter VIII crpc s 107 111,112,113,114,115,118 held illegal

Court granted compensation to be paid by state and recover it from PSIs salary and start disciplinary action against PSI
2015 allMR(cri) 3998 Oct 2015

⭐⭐If the matter is pending before higher authority then subordinate authority should not proceed.

⭐⭐If the matter is pending before higher authority then subordinate authority should not proceed.

1) AIR 1992 SC 711
Union of India and others v/s Kamlashi Finance Corporations.
(Important Para no.8 )

2) 1995 (Suppl) 3 SCC 434
Chhavi Mehrotra v/s Director General, health Service.
(Important para no. 1)

www.aaplesarkar.maharashtra.gov.in

महाराष्ट्रात आजपासून 'राईट टू सर्व्हिस अॅक्ट' म्हणजेच सेवा हमी कायदा लागू झालाय. यामुळे, आता तुम्हाला जन्म दाखला, लग्नाचा दाखला, लायसन्स अशा तब्बल 43 सरकारी सेवा मिळवण्यासाठी सरकारी कार्यालयांचे उंबरठे झिजवण्याची गरज लागणार नाही.
तब्बल 43 सरकारी सेवा तुम्हाला आता घरबसल्या एका क्लिकवर मिळू शकणार आहेत. यासाठी तुम्हाला सरकारी वेबसाईटवर अप्लाय करावा लागेल... आणि ठराविक कालावधीत तुम्हाला हवे असलेल्या सेवा मिळू शकतील.
महाराष्ट्र सरकारची वेबसाईट

www.aaplesarkar.maharashtra.gov.in

वर ऑनलाईन अप्लाय तुम्हाला करावं लागेल... निर्धारित कालावधीत सरकारी अधिकाऱ्यांना या सेवा नागरिकांना द्याव्या लागणार आहेत, अशी माहिती महाराष्ट्राचे हाऊसिंग राज्यमंत्री रविंद्र वायकर यांनी दिलीय.

या विभागांच्या सेवांचा आहे समावेश...
महसूल विभाग, नोंदणी व मुद्रांक विभाग, ग्रामविकास व पंचायत राज विभाग, कामगार विभाग, जलसंपदा विभाग, शासन मुद्रण लेखनसामग्री व प्रकाशन संचालनालय, कौशल्य विकास आणि उद्योजकता विभाग, वन विभाग आणि नोंदणी व मुद्रांक विभागाच्या सेवा तुम्हाला आता ऑनलाईन मिळू शकतील.
या सेवांचा आहे समावेश....

• वय राष्ट्रीयत्व आणि अधिवास प्रमाणपत्र
• मिळकतीचे प्रमाणपत्र
• तात्पुरता रहिवास प्रमाणपत्र
• ज्येष्ठ नागरिक प्रमाणपत्र
• पत दाखला
• सांस्कृतिक कार्यक्रम परवाना
• प्रमाणित नक्कल मिळणे बाबत अर्ज
• अल्पभूधारक शेतकरी असल्याचे प्रतिज्ञापत्र
• भूमिहीन प्रमाणपत्र
• शेतकरी असल्याचा दाखला
• सर्वसाधारण प्रतिज्ञापत्र
• डोंगर/ दुर्गम क्षेत्रात राहत असल्याचे प्रमाणपत्र
• जन्म नोंद दाखला
• मृत्यु नोंद दाखला
• विवाह नोंदणी दाखला
• रहिवाशी प्रमाणपत्र
• दारिद्र्य रेषेखालील असल्याचा दाखला
• हयातीचा दाखला
• ग्रामपंचायत येणे बाकी दाखला
• निराधार असल्याचा दाखला
• शौचालयाचा दाखला
• विधवा असल्याचा दाखला
• दुकाने आणि अस्थापना नोंदणी
• दुकाने आणि अस्थापना नुतनीकरण
• कंत्राटी कामगार मुख्य मालक नोंदणी
• कंत्राटी कामगार अनुज्ञप्ती नोंदणी
• कंत्राटी कामगार अनुज्ञप्ती नुतनीकरण
• नोकरी उत्सुक उमेदवारांची नोंदणी
• सेवानियोजकाची नोंदणी
• शोध उपलब्ध करणे
• मुद्रांक शुल्क भरण्याचे प्रयोजनार्थ मुल्यांकन अहवाल देणे
• दस्त नोंदणी न केलेल्या प्रकरणांमध्ये, ई-पेमेंट पद्धतीने भरलेल्या नोंदणी फीचा परतावा
...तर सरकारी बाबूंना भरावा लागेल दंड
'राईट टू सर्व्हिस अॅक्ट'मध्ये हलगर्जीपणा करणाऱ्या अधिकाऱ्यांना दंड लावण्याची तरतूद राज्य शासनानं केलीय. निर्धारित वेळत तुम्हाला सेवा मिळाली नाही तर जबाबदार अधिकाऱ्याला 500 ते 5000 रुपयांपर्यंत दंड बसेल.
सध्या सेवा हमी कायद्यात केवळ 43 सेवांचा समावेश असला तरी येत्या वर्षी मार्चपर्यंत या सेवांचा आकडा 135 वर जाण्याची शक्यता आहे.